Skip links

4 Major Principles of the Us Legal System

These four universal principles form a working definition of the rule of law. They have been developed according to internationally recognized norms and standards and tested and refined in consultation with a wide variety of experts around the world. Additional procedural rules require that laws be applied fairly and uniformly and that the separation of powers be respected in surrender and justice proceedings. While this argument has considerable merit, the danger of incorporating law and order as one of the principles that make up the rule of law is that the maintenance of security is often achieved through laws and actions that violate the human rights of individuals. [61] For this reason, this principle is not always established within the framework of the rule of law. The principles of the rule of law are also substantive in that laws must be just and in conformity with the norms and standards of international human rights law. The rule of law also requires the avoidance of arbitrariness in the law. Second, the federal judicial system is based on a system of “jurisdiction,” that is, the geographic distribution of the courts at certain levels. For example, while there is only one Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal is divided into 13 counties and there are 94 district courts. In addition, each state judicial system includes its own “jurisdiction”. As mentioned earlier, the jurisdiction in which a case occurred determines which court decisions constitute binding precedents.

[The rule of law] refers to a principle of governance in which all public and private persons, institutions and bodies, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that are publicly proclaimed, applied equally and independently decided, and that are in conformity with international human rights norms and standards. It also requires measures to ensure respect for the principles of the rule of law, equality before the law, accountability before the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, participation in decision-making, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural and legal transparency. [9] It is clear that the objectives of the U.S. legal system are broad and well thought out. The U.S. legal system was developed with the goal of establishing a set of standards that describe what is to be considered minimally acceptable behavior. Overall, federal laws are the ones that all citizens of the United States are expected to obey. State and local laws can often resemble federal laws, but they can also be very different and govern only state citizens.

In fact, the phrase has been quoted so many times that one commentator wrote that the phrase “has become meaningless due to ideological abuse and general overuse.” [2] I disagree. Because of the potential of the challenge to inspire individual actors and inform political and social change, it is important to rigorously identify the importance of the rule of law. To the extent that we can more clearly identify the principles of the rule of law, we can more effectively support the legal and political reforms that will advance them. Civil law systems rely less on precedents than on codes that explicitly provide decision-making rules for many specific disputes. If a judge has to go beyond the letter of a code to settle a dispute, the judge`s settlement will not become binding or perhaps even relevant to subsequent decisions involving other parties. Complete client relationship management system for law firms. The courts play a key role in upholding the rule of law, particularly when hearing complaints from minority groups or persons representing minority views. Equality before the law is such an essential part of the U.S. system of government that when a majority, intentionally or unintentionally, violates the rights of a minority, the court may deem it appropriate to hear both sides of the controversy in court. First, the Constitution is based on the conviction that the only legitimate Constitution is one that emanates from and is controlled by the people. A constitution is therefore more than a body of rules and material principles. As Thomas Paine wrote, “A constitution is not the act of a government, but of a people forming a government, and a government without a constitution is a power without justice.” This principle is explained in the preamble to the Constitution, which proclaims that the Constitution is not ordered and established by the government, but by “we the people”.

Another of Bingham`s secondary principles is an eighth principle that states: “The rule of law requires the state to comply with its obligations under international law as well as national law.” [72] A thoughtful scholar who writes about the rule of law has argued that the maintenance of public order and the protection of persons and property should be one of the principles that make up the rule of law. Rachel Kleinfeld Belton wrote: Federalism, the separation of powers and the rule of law are at the heart of the U.S. Constitution. But there are also other basic principles of the system, all of which contribute significantly to the achievement of freedom, order and justice. If we look at the Constitution as a whole, as the drafters perceived it, we find that its essential characteristics are as follows: without an independent legal profession, there is no certainty that just laws and the protection of human rights will be enforced. An independent judiciary cannot do this alone. In fact, it could be argued that an independent judiciary will not exist without an independent bar. The U.S. legal system is adversarial and based on the premise that a genuine and living dispute involving parties who have a genuine interest in its outcome will allow for the fiercest legal debate on the issues and that the courts should not have the power to make decisions unless they are a response to a genuine controversy. Therefore, federal courts are prohibited from giving “advisory” opinions or opinions that do not involve a live case or controversy. (These principles are based on Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which limits the jurisdiction of the Federal Court to “cases and controversies.” Unlike federal courts, some states allow cases that are not based on live controversy and therefore do not share the Federal Court`s bias against expert opinions.) This idea is pushed forward in Bingham`s sixth secondary principle.

[68] This can be assumed in the sixth principle on the applicability of rights in court, but it is an important idea that can be expressed as a separate principle. More than a hundred years ago, Roscoe Pound claimed that “[t]he delay is justice denied.” [69] The claim was true in 1906 and is even true today, with higher costs and delays built into the civil justice system. The American legal system is based on a system of federalism or decentralization. While the national or “federal” government itself has significant powers, individual states retain powers that are not explicitly listed as exclusively federal. Most states have judicial systems equivalent to those of the federal judicial system. It is unlikely that all these principles are firmly present in a society. This does not require the conclusion that the rule of law does not exist in such a society. Based on the British legal system, the American legal system is divided into a federal system and a state and local system. The primary objective of both systems is to create order and a means of settling disputes, as well as to protect the rights of citizens.

Conflicts are to be expected given the different needs, wishes, goals, value systems and perspectives of people. The U.S. legal system provides a formal means of resolving disputes through the courts. In addition to the Federal Supreme Court and the systems of the various states, there are also several informal means of dispute resolution, collectively called alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Mediation and arbitration are examples. The principles of the rule of law mentioned in this definition are both procedural and substantive. Cases are legal decisions based on a number of specific facts involving parties with a genuine interest in the controversy. The American democratic system is not always based on simple majority rule. There are certain principles that are so important to the nation that the majority has agreed not to interfere in these areas. For example, the Bill of Rights was adopted because concepts such as freedom of religion, freedom of expression, equal treatment and due process were considered so important that without constitutional amendment, even a majority should not be allowed to change it.